Soustitre
Until now, two main sets of arguments have dominated the debate on the nature of the
massacres that were perpetrated in Rwanda before the 1994 genocide. The first one
maintains that they constituted a response to prior attacks by the RPF,implying that they
should be regarded as military operations, rather than as acts of ethnic cleansing.The second
common line of argument is that these massacres served as pilot runs for the subsequent
genocide, implying that they were part of a plan that was not to see its full implementation
until 1994.This paper puts forth a third, alternative interpretation of these massacres.The
first of the aforementioned arguments, it is contended, does not take into account the detailed
evidence that is available on the killings: the fact that they took place in the context of the
civil war accounts for the timing of the massacres, but not for their genocidal character. In
turn, the second interpretation fails to situate these massacres against the agro-pastoral and
ideological background of the regime that committed them. By contrast, this paper shows that
the massacres took place in areas characterized by a specific history of spatial and social
engineering. They are best understood against the background of the processes of land
colonization, resettlement, depredation and dispossession of cattle and land that were under
way in the areas where the land was most scarce, and where the peasant society was being
subject to rationalization and remodelling from above.The paper concludes that pastoralism
was sentenced to disappear from Rwanda and that the massacres should be considered
instances of ethnic cleansing.
Cote
Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 11 No. 3, July 2011, pp. 396–419.